Somewhat surprisingly, the liberal New York Times last Tuesday urged Congress to give President Trump âhis border money.â I agree with the Times on this vital national security issue.
In a convincing editorial, the Times acknowledged âthereâs a crisis at the southern border, just not the one he (Trump) rants about. ... But as record numbers of Central American families flee violence and poverty in their homelands, they are overwhelming U.S. border systems, fueling a humanitarian crisis of overcrowding, disease and chaos.â The influential national newspaper went on to note âthe Border Patrol is now averaging 1,200 daily arrests with many migrants arriving exhausted and sick.â With apologies to 19th century American poet Emma Lazarus, I view those unskilled, undereducated asylum seekers as the Third Worldâs âwretched refuse.â
The Times noted nearly three-quarters of the border funding requested by President Trump âwould be earmarked for humanitarian needsâ while none of the money âwould go toward Mr. Trumpâs border wall.â Nevertheless, âseveral hundred million dollars would go toward shoring up border security operations, including increasing the number of detention beds overseen by ICE, a non-starter for Democrats.â
âConsider how extraordinary it is that the Times feels compelled to describe any effort to enhance border security ... as ânonstartersâ for Democrats,â wrote Guy Benson, a well-informed columnist for the conservative website Townhall. âUnfortunately, a significant portion of the Democratic Party is overtly or effectively in favor of âcatch and releaseâ policies that inexorably increase the number of illegal immigrants living in the United States.â
So why canât Congress bring itself to give the president what he wants in order to alleviate the humanitarian disaster on our southern border with Mexico and provide funds so ICE and the Border Patrol can combat drug and human trafficking on the border? Because that would be regarded by left-wing Democrats as a âvictoryâ for President Trump, and they wonât allow that to happen even though many moderate Democrats recognize the ever deteriorating humanitarian and security situation on the border.
According to the White House, âIn February, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) encountered more than 76,000 illegal border crossers and inadmissible aliens, and in March that number exceeded 100,000, the highest monthly level in more than a decade.â Thatâs a crisis by anyoneâs definition and yet âprogressiveâ Democrats refuse to address this high priority national security issue.
A recent ABC/Washington Post poll found âa full 72 percent of Democrats view illegal immigration as âa crisis or a serious problemââ while a recent report by the Homeland Security Advisory Council cited âa 600 percent increase in families migrating from Central America as responsible for bringing âimmigration management systems to the point of collapse.ââ That same report urged ICE âto crack down on âfake familiesâ using children as âpawnsâ at the border.â
President Trump last Tuesday signed-off on a new immigration plan developed by his senior adviser/son-in-law Jared Kushner that would strengthen border security and create a more âmerit-basedâ system that would give preference to skilled immigrants rather than to those who already have relatives in the U.S. Kushnerâs plan makes good sense, which means itâs probably dead on arrival in Congress. At the same time, Trump is directing his top immigration officials to take much-needed steps to âtoughen and accelerate the processâ for Central American asylum seekers.
âOur asylum system is broken and human smugglers and criminals are profiting from its weaknesses and flaws,â said Rep. Mike Rogers of Alabama, the ranking Republican on the House Homeland Security Committee. Congress should fix the broken asylum system, and the sooner the better.
Guy W. Farmer, a retired diplomat, follows immigration issues closely.
-->Somewhat surprisingly, the liberal New York Times last Tuesday urged Congress to give President Trump âhis border money.â I agree with the Times on this vital national security issue.
In a convincing editorial, the Times acknowledged âthereâs a crisis at the southern border, just not the one he (Trump) rants about. ... But as record numbers of Central American families flee violence and poverty in their homelands, they are overwhelming U.S. border systems, fueling a humanitarian crisis of overcrowding, disease and chaos.â The influential national newspaper went on to note âthe Border Patrol is now averaging 1,200 daily arrests with many migrants arriving exhausted and sick.â With apologies to 19th century American poet Emma Lazarus, I view those unskilled, undereducated asylum seekers as the Third Worldâs âwretched refuse.â
The Times noted nearly three-quarters of the border funding requested by President Trump âwould be earmarked for humanitarian needsâ while none of the money âwould go toward Mr. Trumpâs border wall.â Nevertheless, âseveral hundred million dollars would go toward shoring up border security operations, including increasing the number of detention beds overseen by ICE, a non-starter for Democrats.â
âConsider how extraordinary it is that the Times feels compelled to describe any effort to enhance border security ... as ânonstartersâ for Democrats,â wrote Guy Benson, a well-informed columnist for the conservative website Townhall. âUnfortunately, a significant portion of the Democratic Party is overtly or effectively in favor of âcatch and releaseâ policies that inexorably increase the number of illegal immigrants living in the United States.â
So why canât Congress bring itself to give the president what he wants in order to alleviate the humanitarian disaster on our southern border with Mexico and provide funds so ICE and the Border Patrol can combat drug and human trafficking on the border? Because that would be regarded by left-wing Democrats as a âvictoryâ for President Trump, and they wonât allow that to happen even though many moderate Democrats recognize the ever deteriorating humanitarian and security situation on the border.
According to the White House, âIn February, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) encountered more than 76,000 illegal border crossers and inadmissible aliens, and in March that number exceeded 100,000, the highest monthly level in more than a decade.â Thatâs a crisis by anyoneâs definition and yet âprogressiveâ Democrats refuse to address this high priority national security issue.
A recent ABC/Washington Post poll found âa full 72 percent of Democrats view illegal immigration as âa crisis or a serious problemââ while a recent report by the Homeland Security Advisory Council cited âa 600 percent increase in families migrating from Central America as responsible for bringing âimmigration management systems to the point of collapse.ââ That same report urged ICE âto crack down on âfake familiesâ using children as âpawnsâ at the border.â
President Trump last Tuesday signed-off on a new immigration plan developed by his senior adviser/son-in-law Jared Kushner that would strengthen border security and create a more âmerit-basedâ system that would give preference to skilled immigrants rather than to those who already have relatives in the U.S. Kushnerâs plan makes good sense, which means itâs probably dead on arrival in Congress. At the same time, Trump is directing his top immigration officials to take much-needed steps to âtoughen and accelerate the processâ for Central American asylum seekers.
âOur asylum system is broken and human smugglers and criminals are profiting from its weaknesses and flaws,â said Rep. Mike Rogers of Alabama, the ranking Republican on the House Homeland Security Committee. Congress should fix the broken asylum system, and the sooner the better.
Guy W. Farmer, a retired diplomat, follows immigration issues closely.